May Op-Ed - Peak in sight... but it's a twin peak
- Central banks are deliberating whether policy tightening delivered to date is sufficient to restore price stability.
- For the Fed and the ECB, this appears to set the central banks on a divergent path – the Fed has probably reached a peak; the ECB has further to go.
- The evolution of inflation dynamics explains much of this divergence. The US sees mounting signs of deceleration in core inflation and wage growth. Eurozone core inflation remains close to peak and wage growth elevated.
- Tech performance takes over after a year driven by energy and oil.
- The AI value chain is boosting investment opportunities.
ECB to go on alone
Central banks have been displaying some frustration at the apparent lack of response from the economy to their policy tightening. Evidence is however now accumulating that transmission is materializing. In both the US and the Euro area, the recent surveys on banks’ behavior have been reporting a significant tightening in lending standards – and this pre-dated the recent banking turmoil around US regional banks and Credit Suisse. But maybe more interestingly, the latest batch of surveys reflect a steep decline in the demand for credit from the business sector. This suggests that the rise in interest rates is now affecting behavior outside the financial sphere and hitting the real economy.
The key issue is how confident central banks can be that this change in behavior is going to be swift enough to dampen inflation before it becomes fully entrenched. Presently, there seems to be a difference of appreciation between the Fed and the ECB.
The Fed, upon hiking its policy rate by 25 basis points (bps) in May, hinted at a pause. The ECB produced the same additional tightening, but also signaled that it was inclined to continue, stating that monetary conditions are not yet “restrictive enough.”
This difference, to some extent, reflects the dataflow. In the US, signs of disinflation are becoming more tangible beyond the mechanical impact of lower energy costs, in particular the crucial “services excluding rents” component of the consumer price index slowing down significantly. Further up the price pipeline, core producer prices are also going in the right direction. In the Euro area, although core inflation has lost 10 bps in April year-on-year, the improvement still looks shaky and overly driven by the behavior of small, idiosyncratic components (e.g., package holidays in Germany). Maybe more fundamentally, while in the US, despite a still strong labor market, wages have stopped accelerating. The ECB is bracing for further underlying cost pressure as in some countries – e.g., Germany – wage negotiations are pointing to a very significant acceleration later this year and again at the beginning of 2024. Besides, from the point of view of the balance of power within the ECB Governing Council, we think it matters that all the already hawkish Governors from the old “D-Mark zone” – Austria, Belgium, the Netherlands – are facing particularly strong inflation in their countries.
Beyond the differences in dataflow, we also suspect that the Fed is willing to take a “forward looking” approach, counting on the lagged effect of its accumulated tightening to make inflation fall without the need for further action, while the ECB seems to be driven by an “empirical” approach and wants to see a proper, sustained decline in core inflation before downshifting and ultimately stopping.
Of course, we should not overstate the “divergence” between the Fed and ECB. The Fed commentary maintains a “tightening bias,” with a balance of risks firmly tilted towards more tightening if need be. Yet, while our baseline has the ECB pausing after a last 25 bps hike in July, we see a significant risk that it moves again in September, since we expect only a small deceleration in core inflation this summer, which may add to the frustrations of the Governing Council. We could thus have nearly 6 months of continuing hikes from the ECB while the Fed would stay put.
However, what we find striking in this environment – and market pricing is consistent with an even deeper divergence, with rate cuts expected in the second half of the year in the US – is that the euro exchange rate has stopped appreciating. This may reflect a belief that, irrespective of what the ECB does on rates, a recession in the US – the product of the lagged monetary tightening – would have profound adverse consequences on the euro area economy, triggering the usual “flight to safety” favorable to the US dollar – despite the current political conflict around the debt ceiling.
Technology booms, but not a bubble
Technology stocks have led the way in terms of US equity market performance so far in 2023. This stands in stark contrast to what happened last year when the technology sector saw a marked drop in earnings and a significant reduction in valuation multiples. Companies responded with layoffs amid concerns that a general slowdown in economic growth would reduce enterprise demand for technology, coming after the post-pandemic softening of demand at the consumer end of the market. So why the turnaround? One factor could be that these are nimble companies, able to reduce costs quickly by firing programmers and developers. Another could be that a large part of the adjustment in the technology sector could have come in start-ups and smaller companies, something that may have been exacerbated by reduced funding from venture capitalists. The problems in California’s banking sector points to this as well. However, for big-cap stocks the story is all about the future. The Biden administration’s industrial policies, including the CHIPS (Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors) and Inflation Reduction Acts, have the potential to generate a secular boost to investment in technology. The launch of ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer) has also been a factor, raising the possibility of endless applications of generative artificial intelligence (AI) not just in the technology sector itself but across the economy.
There are concerns that US equity market performance is heavily concentrated in large-cap technology stocks. Indeed, it is quite easy to show that all the total return performance of the S&P 500 index in 2023 can be explained by price gains among 10 stocks which together account for 25% of the market’s total capitalization. At the same time, technology has done well in other markets. In the EuroStoxx universe, the technology sector is the third best performing sector this year after travel and leisure and the luxury goods sectors – both of which continue to benefit from the post-COVID recovery in travel and China’s re-opening.